Tag: Boxer: Page 3
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has released the full text of its surface transportation reauthorization bill. It's called MAP-21 (SAFETEA-LU it isn't), and of course, it's an acronym (they have people for this) -- Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has released the full text of its surface transportation reauthorization bill. It's called MAP-21 (SAFETEA-LU it isn't), and of course, it's an acronym (they have people for this) -- Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has released the full text of its surface transportation reauthorization bill. It's called MAP-21 (SAFETEA-LU it isn't), and of course, it's an acronym (they have people for this) -- Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has released the full text of its surface transportation reauthorization bill. It's called MAP-21 (SAFETEA-LU it isn't), and of course, it's an acronym (they have people for this) -- Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has released the full text of its surface transportation reauthorization bill. It's called MAP-21 (SAFETEA-LU it isn't), and of course, it's an acronym (they have people for this) -- Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has released the full text of its surface transportation reauthorization bill. It's called MAP-21 (SAFETEA-LU it isn't), and of course, it's an acronym (they have people for this) -- Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has released the full text of its surface transportation reauthorization bill. It's called MAP-21 (SAFETEA-LU it isn't), and of course, it's an acronym (they have people for this) -- Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has released the full text of its surface transportation reauthorization bill. It's called MAP-21 (SAFETEA-LU it isn't), and of course, it's an acronym (they have people for this) -- Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has released the full text of its surface transportation reauthorization bill. It's called MAP-21 (SAFETEA-LU it isn't), and of course, it's an acronym (they have people for this) -- Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act. December 5, 2011
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out.,The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has oh so recently announced its two-year surface transportation bill proposal, (see my blog post, "Is this it? Or something like it?" for full proposal details), and now, in a unanimous vote , has approved the proposal. On it moves in the legislative process.
How the Senate's two-year bill will find a way to work with the House's push for a six-year bill is to be worked out. And how the Senate hopes to keep spending levels as they are now when the Highway Trust Fund can't do that is also still to be worked out. December 5, 2011