Tag: Aggregates Manager: Page 9
Case Construction Equipment crowned the champion of its Triple Threat Rodeo series on Feb. 24 during the World of Concrete 2012 in Las Vegas, following a day-long competition among 59 of the United States and Canada’s most talented equipment operators at the 2012 World of Concrete show in Las Vegas. Case awarded prizes with a total value of nearly $140,000 at the end of the competition.,Case Construction Equipment crowned the champion of its Triple Threat Rodeo series on Feb. 24 during the World of Concrete 2012 in Las Vegas, following a day-long competition among 59 of the United States and Canada’s most talented equipment operators at the 2012 World of Concrete show in Las Vegas. Case awarded prizes with a total value of nearly $140,000 at the end of the competition.,Case Construction Equipment crowned the champion of its Triple Threat Rodeo series on Feb. 24 during the World of Concrete 2012 in Las Vegas, following a day-long competition among 59 of the United States and Canada’s most talented equipment operators at the 2012 World of Concrete show in Las Vegas. Case awarded prizes with a total value of nearly $140,000 at the end of the competition.,Case Construction Equipment crowned the champion of its Triple Threat Rodeo series on Feb. 24 during the World of Concrete 2012 in Las Vegas, following a day-long competition among 59 of the United States and Canada’s most talented equipment operators at the 2012 World of Concrete show in Las Vegas. Case awarded prizes with a total value of nearly $140,000 at the end of the competition.,Case Construction Equipment crowned the champion of its Triple Threat Rodeo series on Feb. 24 during the World of Concrete 2012 in Las Vegas, following a day-long competition among 59 of the United States and Canada’s most talented equipment operators at the 2012 World of Concrete show in Las Vegas. Case awarded prizes with a total value of nearly $140,000 at the end of the competition.,Case Construction Equipment crowned the champion of its Triple Threat Rodeo series on Feb. 24 during the World of Concrete 2012 in Las Vegas, following a day-long competition among 59 of the United States and Canada’s most talented equipment operators at the 2012 World of Concrete show in Las Vegas. Case awarded prizes with a total value of nearly $140,000 at the end of the competition.,Case Construction Equipment crowned the champion of its Triple Threat Rodeo series on Feb. 24 during the World of Concrete 2012 in Las Vegas, following a day-long competition among 59 of the United States and Canada’s most talented equipment operators at the 2012 World of Concrete show in Las Vegas. Case awarded prizes with a total value of nearly $140,000 at the end of the competition.,Case Construction Equipment crowned the champion of its Triple Threat Rodeo series on Feb. 24 during the World of Concrete 2012 in Las Vegas, following a day-long competition among 59 of the United States and Canada’s most talented equipment operators at the 2012 World of Concrete show in Las Vegas. Case awarded prizes with a total value of nearly $140,000 at the end of the competition.,Case Construction Equipment crowned the champion of its Triple Threat Rodeo series on Feb. 24 during the World of Concrete 2012 in Las Vegas, following a day-long competition among 59 of the United States and Canada’s most talented equipment operators at the 2012 World of Concrete show in Las Vegas. Case awarded prizes with a total value of nearly $140,000 at the end of the competition.,Case Construction Equipment crowned the champion of its Triple Threat Rodeo series on Feb. 24 during the World of Concrete 2012 in Las Vegas, following a day-long competition among 59 of the United States and Canada’s most talented equipment operators at the 2012 World of Concrete show in Las Vegas. Case awarded prizes with a total value of nearly $140,000 at the end of the competition. February 21, 2012
California's legislation requiring that used vehicle dealers, including heavy-duty truck dealers, post a red warning label on vehicles flagged in a federal database as junk, salvage, total loss, or title branded mark's the nation’s first law (Assembly Bill 1215) of this kind.
California AB 1215 mandates all dealers using the California Electronic Titling (ELT) system use an National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS)-based vehicle history report, obtained from an authorized access provider. The law also provides for an increase in the maximum documentation fees that auto dealers can charge consumers. Dealers can now charge up to $80 per new or used purchase/leased vehicle, up from $45 for vehicle purchase transactions and $55 for lease transactions.,California's legislation requiring that used vehicle dealers, including heavy-duty truck dealers, post a red warning label on vehicles flagged in a federal database as junk, salvage, total loss, or title branded mark's the nation’s first law (Assembly Bill 1215) of this kind.
California AB 1215 mandates all dealers using the California Electronic Titling (ELT) system use an National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS)-based vehicle history report, obtained from an authorized access provider. The law also provides for an increase in the maximum documentation fees that auto dealers can charge consumers. Dealers can now charge up to $80 per new or used purchase/leased vehicle, up from $45 for vehicle purchase transactions and $55 for lease transactions.,California's legislation requiring that used vehicle dealers, including heavy-duty truck dealers, post a red warning label on vehicles flagged in a federal database as junk, salvage, total loss, or title branded mark's the nation’s first law (Assembly Bill 1215) of this kind.
California AB 1215 mandates all dealers using the California Electronic Titling (ELT) system use an National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS)-based vehicle history report, obtained from an authorized access provider. The law also provides for an increase in the maximum documentation fees that auto dealers can charge consumers. Dealers can now charge up to $80 per new or used purchase/leased vehicle, up from $45 for vehicle purchase transactions and $55 for lease transactions.,California's legislation requiring that used vehicle dealers, including heavy-duty truck dealers, post a red warning label on vehicles flagged in a federal database as junk, salvage, total loss, or title branded mark's the nation’s first law (Assembly Bill 1215) of this kind.
California AB 1215 mandates all dealers using the California Electronic Titling (ELT) system use an National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS)-based vehicle history report, obtained from an authorized access provider. The law also provides for an increase in the maximum documentation fees that auto dealers can charge consumers. Dealers can now charge up to $80 per new or used purchase/leased vehicle, up from $45 for vehicle purchase transactions and $55 for lease transactions.,California's legislation requiring that used vehicle dealers, including heavy-duty truck dealers, post a red warning label on vehicles flagged in a federal database as junk, salvage, total loss, or title branded mark's the nation’s first law (Assembly Bill 1215) of this kind.
California AB 1215 mandates all dealers using the California Electronic Titling (ELT) system use an National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS)-based vehicle history report, obtained from an authorized access provider. The law also provides for an increase in the maximum documentation fees that auto dealers can charge consumers. Dealers can now charge up to $80 per new or used purchase/leased vehicle, up from $45 for vehicle purchase transactions and $55 for lease transactions.,California's legislation requiring that used vehicle dealers, including heavy-duty truck dealers, post a red warning label on vehicles flagged in a federal database as junk, salvage, total loss, or title branded mark's the nation’s first law (Assembly Bill 1215) of this kind.
California AB 1215 mandates all dealers using the California Electronic Titling (ELT) system use an National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS)-based vehicle history report, obtained from an authorized access provider. The law also provides for an increase in the maximum documentation fees that auto dealers can charge consumers. Dealers can now charge up to $80 per new or used purchase/leased vehicle, up from $45 for vehicle purchase transactions and $55 for lease transactions.,California's legislation requiring that used vehicle dealers, including heavy-duty truck dealers, post a red warning label on vehicles flagged in a federal database as junk, salvage, total loss, or title branded mark's the nation’s first law (Assembly Bill 1215) of this kind.
California AB 1215 mandates all dealers using the California Electronic Titling (ELT) system use an National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS)-based vehicle history report, obtained from an authorized access provider. The law also provides for an increase in the maximum documentation fees that auto dealers can charge consumers. Dealers can now charge up to $80 per new or used purchase/leased vehicle, up from $45 for vehicle purchase transactions and $55 for lease transactions.,California's legislation requiring that used vehicle dealers, including heavy-duty truck dealers, post a red warning label on vehicles flagged in a federal database as junk, salvage, total loss, or title branded mark's the nation’s first law (Assembly Bill 1215) of this kind.
California AB 1215 mandates all dealers using the California Electronic Titling (ELT) system use an National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS)-based vehicle history report, obtained from an authorized access provider. The law also provides for an increase in the maximum documentation fees that auto dealers can charge consumers. Dealers can now charge up to $80 per new or used purchase/leased vehicle, up from $45 for vehicle purchase transactions and $55 for lease transactions.,California's legislation requiring that used vehicle dealers, including heavy-duty truck dealers, post a red warning label on vehicles flagged in a federal database as junk, salvage, total loss, or title branded mark's the nation’s first law (Assembly Bill 1215) of this kind.
California AB 1215 mandates all dealers using the California Electronic Titling (ELT) system use an National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS)-based vehicle history report, obtained from an authorized access provider. The law also provides for an increase in the maximum documentation fees that auto dealers can charge consumers. Dealers can now charge up to $80 per new or used purchase/leased vehicle, up from $45 for vehicle purchase transactions and $55 for lease transactions. November 1, 2011
Volvo Trucks North America has reorganized its management team.
The reorganization includes three new managers. According to a company statement, the move was to “align” the organizational structure with parent Volvo Global Trucks. ,Volvo Trucks North America has reorganized its management team.
The reorganization includes three new managers. According to a company statement, the move was to “align” the organizational structure with parent Volvo Global Trucks. ,Volvo Trucks North America has reorganized its management team.
The reorganization includes three new managers. According to a company statement, the move was to “align” the organizational structure with parent Volvo Global Trucks. ,Volvo Trucks North America has reorganized its management team.
The reorganization includes three new managers. According to a company statement, the move was to “align” the organizational structure with parent Volvo Global Trucks. ,Volvo Trucks North America has reorganized its management team.
The reorganization includes three new managers. According to a company statement, the move was to “align” the organizational structure with parent Volvo Global Trucks. ,Volvo Trucks North America has reorganized its management team.
The reorganization includes three new managers. According to a company statement, the move was to “align” the organizational structure with parent Volvo Global Trucks. ,Volvo Trucks North America has reorganized its management team.
The reorganization includes three new managers. According to a company statement, the move was to “align” the organizational structure with parent Volvo Global Trucks. ,Volvo Trucks North America has reorganized its management team.
The reorganization includes three new managers. According to a company statement, the move was to “align” the organizational structure with parent Volvo Global Trucks. October 6, 2011
For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement.,For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement.,For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement.,For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement.,For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement.,For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement.,For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement.,For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement.,For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement.,For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement.,For the second time in less than a year, an Administrative Law Judge has held that the Mine Safety Administration (MSHA) failed to demonstrate there were hazards of having haul trucks overturn from an unbermed elevated truck scale at an aggregates operation. The June 22, 2011, decision by ALJ Andrews in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., mirrors findings issued on July 7, 2010, by ALJ Rae in a similar case involving Knife River Corp. (Look in the August 2011 print edition of Aggregates Manager for a detailed news article on this case.) However, a key difference is that ALJ Rae’s ruling predated MSHA’s August 26, 2010 Program Policy Letter (P10-IV-01) that declared the agency’s intention to cite any truck scales that were elevated more than 16 inches above ground level under 30 CFR 56.9300, unless they were equipped with mid-axle berms or railings. The decision in Lakeview Rock Products, Inc. is the first to address this scenario in light of MSHA’s policy pronouncement. July 1, 2011
